I don't think Su BEIFONG would be working with the Red Lotus imo. Didn't the original Team Avatar work against them? Su doesn't have any real motive. But I do agree she sounds fishy, suspicious, and awkward in some dialogue tho. And I'd still like to know why Ai Wei did what he did, and why Su didn't know he was bad before. Toph shouldve taught lin/su how to tell lies tbh. im prepared for a plot twist




Well we don’t know the red lotus backstory yet. Maybe we’ll see next week. I’d say we shouldn’t be too focused on motives until we hear the full story with them.

Why do people think simply being Toph’s daughter is proof of Su’s character? I’ve seen multiple people try to use Su’s parentage as an argument that she can’t be with the Red Lotus. The vast difference between Zuko and Azula is proof that genetics mean squat; any person can be good and any person can be evil, regardless of their parents. it’s all about personal choices, not the morals of one’s family.

I wonder if Su found a way to beat Toph’s lie detector talents. Polygraphs can be beaten in real life; maybe Su figured out how to beat Toph.


Walt Disney Animation Studios | 1937 - 2014

After seeing this post, I decided to make this. The “Experimental” era is usually referred to as Post-Renaissance. I imagine the Revival is going to continue through this decade. 2015 and beyond films listed are: (left to right) Zootopia, Giants, and Moana.

If you want to read more about each era and how they got their names, click here.

On your journeys you each captured different Pokémon and with your different personalities you learn to understand and care for them in different ways. Pokémon are special and they need our special care just like every other living creature, they deserve our consideration and our respect. If we care for them the way we care for those we love we may be able to live in peace as we learn about them and ourselves, my research taught me that we need to deal with Pokémon like we need to deal with people; as individuals if you want to discover there mysteries.

Professor Oak (via blue-evolver)

"We’re not at each other’s throats. We’re a little more understanding of the situation" - Jennifer Morrison


"Regina understands that is was a mistake, it wasn’t her intention to destroy my happiness" - Lana Parrilla

That was JMO and Lana about Emma and Regina going into season 4. I find it impossible to relate that to Regina trying to kill off anyone in the way of her happiness. 

I am telling you all, they are fuckin with us. I for one, am not going to get worked up over anything until I personally see season 4 with my own eyes. 

Her words didn’t even necessarily indicated she wanted to kill Marian - only that she wanted a threat to her happiness removed. If she’s referring to Marian, that could mean saddling her up with someone else, sending her out of town, or sending her back in time for all we know. That shows Regina still resorting to dirty tricks but without taking the darkest paths like she used to.  


Alright I’m 99.9% sure they’re just fuckin with us on Regina reverting. Let us chill and stay calm…

Did they even imply she’d revert? Lana just said “old habits die hard”, which is a statement that can refer to someone even if they’re a good guy. Like Gold, Regina can grow to be a better person than she was before and fight on the side of good, but she’ll have a hard time not falling back on certain habits and responses to circumstances that she had when she was evil. In this case, lashing out against others for something that’s actually more her fault than their’s. 

Next » Archive